Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 6.03 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X is way better than the Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored), having a general score of 88.1 against 72.7. IPhone X is a a bit thinner and lighter cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored). IPhone X features a little bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored), because although it has a lot darker screen and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch of display and a slightly higher 1125 x 2436 resolution.
The iPhone X has a lot better performance than Galaxy A16 (Rumored), because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit. Galaxy A16 (Rumored) features a bigger memory to install games and applications than Apple iPhone X, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
Apple iPhone X captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A16 (Rumored), although it has a way worse 12 mega pixels resolution camera in the back, they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture. Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored) features a way better battery duration than iPhone X, because it has an 84% more battery size.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy A16 (Rumored), and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy A16 (Rumored). If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get Galaxy A16 (Rumored), and give up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.