Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 6.03 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XR is much better than the Galaxy A16 (Rumored), getting a overall score of 82 against 72.7. Apple iPhone XR is a a little lighter but a little thicker cellphone than the Galaxy A16 (Rumored). The Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored) has a little bit better display than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a better resolution of 1080 x 2340, more display brightness, a just a bit better pixels number per inch in the display and a little bigger screen.
The iPhone XR has a much faster processor than Galaxy A16 (Rumored), because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM and an inferior number of cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit. The Galaxy A16 (Rumored) counts with a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Apple iPhone XR, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and an external SD slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy A16 (Rumored) features a very superior battery life than iPhone XR, because it has a 70 percent greater battery size. IPhone XR captures slightly better pictures and videos than Galaxy A16 (Rumored), although it has a lot less mega pixels resolution back camera, they both have the same camera aperture.
Although iPhone XR is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored), and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored). So if you want that extra features, you can buy iPhone XR, else you can save some dollars and get the Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored), letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.