Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 6.03 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XS is better than Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored), with a general score of 84.2 against 72.7. IPhone XS's construction is just a bit thinner and somewhat lighter than the Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored). The Apple iPhone XS has a very superior processing unit than Galaxy A16 (Rumored), because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Apple iPhone XS also counts with a 64 bits processor.
IPhone XS has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A16 (Rumored), because although it has much worse brightness and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little better number of pixels per display inch and a little bit higher 1125 x 2436 pixels resolution. The iPhone XS has a bit better camera than Galaxy A16 (Rumored), although it has a back-facing camera with much less mega-pixels, they both have a same size camera aperture.
Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored) counts with a much better memory for games and applications than Apple iPhone XS, because it has more internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy A16 (Rumored) features a much better battery life than Apple iPhone XS, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Although iPhone XS is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored), and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored). So if you want that extra specs, you can buy iPhone XS, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored), resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.