Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored), having a overall score of 80 against 72.7. The Google Pixel 3 is a much lighter device than the Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored), but they have the same thickness. The Google Pixel 3 has a much greater processing power than Galaxy A16 (Rumored). Both of them have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored) has a little bit better looking display than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a just a little worse pixel number in each inch in the display, it also counts with a bigger display and a slightly better 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution. The Google Pixel 3 features a little bit better camera than Galaxy A16 (Rumored), although it has a way lower resolution back facing camera, they both have a same size camera aperture.
Galaxy A16 (Rumored) features a superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB. Galaxy A16 (Rumored) features a very superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2915mAh.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Google Pixel 3 is also a bargain compared to the other phones, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.