Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 14 | Android 5.0 |
| -- | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 385 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.6 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
HTC One M9 is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored), having a 77.7 score against 72.7. HTC One M9's body is noticeably lighter but somewhat thicker than the Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored). Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but HTC One M9 has 5.0 version while Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored) has Android 14.
The HTC One M9 has a slightly better display than Galaxy A16 (Rumored), because although it has a little bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution and a much smaller display, it also counts with a bit greater pixel quantity per display inch. Galaxy A16 (Rumored) features a way bigger memory to store more games and applications than HTC One M9, because it has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
HTC One M9 counts with an extremely better processor than Galaxy A16 (Rumored), because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core processor, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64-bits processor and an extra graphics co-processor. Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored) features a really longer battery life than HTC One M9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
HTC One M9 captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored), although it has a smaller diafragm aperture and a lot lower 20 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, the HTC One M9 is also cheap compared to the Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored).
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.