Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 385 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.03 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The HTC U Ultra is a bit better than the Galaxy A16 (Rumored), with a overall score of 77 against 72.7. HTC U Ultra's design has the same thickness than the Galaxy A16 (Rumored), but it's somewhat lighter. The Galaxy A16 (Rumored) counts with a bit sharper display than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a way worse screen pixels density, it also counts with a larger screen.
Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored) features a slightly better storage capacity to store more apps and games than HTC U Ultra, because although it has an external memory card slot that admits 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory capacity. HTC U Ultra counts with a way better processing power than Galaxy A16 (Rumored), although it has a lower number of cores , they both have 4 GB of RAM.
The Galaxy A16 (Rumored) has a much better battery life than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 67% greater battery capacity. HTC U Ultra takes a little bit better photos and videos than Galaxy A16 (Rumored), although it has a much lower 12 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, they both have the same diafragm aperture.
Although HTC U Ultra is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy A16 (Rumored), and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy A16 (Rumored). So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the HTC U Ultra, else you can save some money and buy the Galaxy A16 (Rumored), giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.