Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | Black and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a score of 81.3, which is better than the Galaxy A16 (Rumored)'s overall score of 72.7. LG V35 ThinQ is a just a bit thinner and way lighter cellphone than the Galaxy A16 (Rumored). LG V35 ThinQ counts with just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A16 (Rumored), because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a higher pixels quantity in each display inch.
The Galaxy A16 (Rumored) has slightly more memory capacity for games and applications than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has an external memory card slot that holds 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. LG V35 ThinQ has a way better processing power than Galaxy A16 (Rumored), and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM.
The LG V35 ThinQ captures slightly better photographs and videos than Galaxy A16 (Rumored), because although it has a lot less megapixels camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better photos and video in poorly lited environments. Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored) counts with a way better battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 52 percent greater battery size.
LG V35 ThinQ costs more than the Galaxy A16 (Rumored), but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.