Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has a global score of 87.1, which is much better than the Galaxy A16 (Rumored)'s 72.7 general score. LG Velvet is a a bit lighter phone than the Galaxy A16 (Rumored), but both are 0.31inches thick. The Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored) has a bit sharper display than LG Velvet, although it has a little bit smaller screen, a little worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a quite inferior number of pixels per inch of screen.
LG Velvet features a better memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy A16 (Rumored), and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the LG Velvet also has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG Velvet has a really superior performance than Galaxy A16 (Rumored), and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG Velvet also has a greater amount of RAM.
LG Velvet counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy A16 (Rumored), although it has a lower resolution back facing camera, they both have a same size aperture. Galaxy A16 (Rumored) features superior battery lifetime than LG Velvet, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
LG Velvet is more expensive than the Galaxy A16 (Rumored), but it's still a great choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.