Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| -- | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto Z3 has a score of 77.6, which is a bit better than Galaxy A16 (Rumored)'s 72.7 overall score. These phones work with Android OS, but the Moto Z3 has the newer 9.0 Pie version while Galaxy A16 (Rumored) has Android 14. Moto Z3's body is thinner and extremely lighter than the Galaxy A16 (Rumored).
The Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored) has just a bit better screen than Motorola Moto Z3, because although it has a just a bit lower pixels count in each inch in the screen, it also counts with a little bit larger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340. Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored) counts with a little bit better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto Z3, because although it has a SD extension slot that supports 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage.
Moto Z3 has a much greater processing power than Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored). Both of them have a 4 GB RAM and the same number of cores. Galaxy A16 (Rumored) has a way better battery life than Moto Z3, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh. The Motorola Moto Z3 counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy A16 (Rumored), although it has a lot less megapixels resolution back camera and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light photos and video.
Although Motorola Moto Z3 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Galaxy A16 (Rumored), and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy A16 (Rumored). If you prefer to save some money, you can get Galaxy A16 (Rumored), and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.