Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Zoom is much better than the Galaxy A16 (Rumored), having an 80 score against 72.7. The Motorola One Zoom is a thicker but just a bit lighter cellphone than the Galaxy A16 (Rumored). Motorola One Zoom has a much faster processing unit than Galaxy A16 (Rumored). Both of them have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM memory.
The Galaxy A16 (Rumored) features just a bit better looking screen than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch in the screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Galaxy A16 (Rumored) also counts with a little bit larger display.
Motorola One Zoom shoots much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored), because although it has a back-facing camera with a worse 48 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light images and videos. The Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored) counts with a much better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored) also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored) has superior battery lifetime than Motorola One Zoom, because it has a 25% larger battery capacity.
Although Motorola One Zoom is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored), and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored). So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Motorola One Zoom, otherwise you can save some money and get the Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored), giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.