Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| $ 200.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is better than Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored), having a overall score of 87 against 72.7. Both devices in our current comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola razr (2020) has older 11 version while Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored) has Android 14. The Motorola razr (2020) body has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored), but it is a bit lighter.
Galaxy A16 (Rumored) has a slightly better looking screen than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, a little larger display and a little higher pixel density. Galaxy A16 (Rumored) counts with a greater storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
The Motorola razr (2020) features a much better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has 4 GB more RAM. The Galaxy A16 (Rumored) has a way better battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
The Motorola razr (2020) takes greater photographs and videos than Galaxy A16 (Rumored), because although it has a lesser megapixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better low-light images and video.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy A16 (Rumored), and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy A16 (Rumored). If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get Galaxy A16 (Rumored), letting go a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.