Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 15 |
| -- | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | -- |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 385 pixels per inch | -- |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 6.03 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is a bit better than Galaxy A16 (Rumored), with a score of 79.2 against 72.7. Both phones we compare here use Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has 15 version while Galaxy A16 (Rumored) has Android 14 version, so it provides the user some additional features and improved performance. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is a incredibly thinner and just a bit lighter cellphone than the Galaxy A16 (Rumored).
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy A16 (Rumored) counts with an incredibly better screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a bit smaller screen and much lower brightness.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) shoots way better pictures and videos than Galaxy A16 (Rumored). They have a back-facing camera with a 50 megapixels and a F1.8 aperture. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a greater memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored), because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored) counts with a little longer battery lifetime than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because it has a 6 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.