Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s is much better than Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored), with a overall score of 86.6 against 72.7. Galaxy A50s's body is just a bit thinner and lighter than Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored). Both of these devices have Android OS, but the Galaxy A50s has the previous 10 version while Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored) has Android 14.
Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored) features a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because although it has a just a bit lower screen density, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2340px, the Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored) also counts with a bit bigger screen. Galaxy A16 (Rumored) has just a bit more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Galaxy A16 (Rumored) also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy A50s counts with a way better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy A50s also has 2 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy A50s takes much better pictures and videos than Galaxy A16 (Rumored), although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light photography and video and a less MP back-facing camera.
The Galaxy A16 (Rumored) counts with longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.