Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored), having a 98.9 score against 72.7. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's body is a bit heavier and a bit thicker than the Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored). These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 13 version and Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored) has Android 14 version.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a slightly better screen than Galaxy A16 (Rumored), because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels, a better pixel amount in each inch of display and a bit bigger display. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a way better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored), and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy A16 (Rumored), and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a back facing camera with way more mega pixels. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra and Galaxy A16 (Rumored) have extremely similar memory for applications and games, they have an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB and the same internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy A16 (Rumored) counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has an 11% more battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a better device, it is way more expensive than Galaxy A16 (Rumored), and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy A16 (Rumored). If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get Galaxy A16 (Rumored), letting go a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.