Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 5.1 |
| -- | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.6 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.03 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 5 is a bit better than the Galaxy A16 (Rumored), having a 79.3 score against 72.7. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Note 5 has the previous 5.1 version while Galaxy A16 (Rumored) has Android 14 version. The Galaxy Note 5 is a a little bit thinner and lighter cellphone than the Galaxy A16 (Rumored).
The Galaxy Note 5 features just a bit better display than Galaxy A16 (Rumored), because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and more pixels per inch in the screen. Galaxy A16 (Rumored) features a much bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that allows up to 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has a much better performing CPU than Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored), although it has a lower number of cores (although faster), they both have the same RAM memory amount. The Galaxy A16 (Rumored) features a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has a slightly better camera than Galaxy A16 (Rumored), although it has a smaller diafragm aperture and a back facing camera with way less megapixels.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note 5 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored), and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored). If you prefer to save some money, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored), letting go a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.