Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a general score of 98, which is much better than the Galaxy A16 (Rumored)'s global score of 72.7. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a thicker and a bit heavier phone than the Galaxy A16 (Rumored). Both of these phones come with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has 13 version and Galaxy A16 (Rumored) has Android 14 version.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little more vivid display than Galaxy A16 (Rumored), because it has a little bit larger screen, a greater count of pixels per inch of display and a higher 1440 x 3200 resolution. Galaxy A16 (Rumored) and Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G both feature incredibly similar storage capacity to store more games and applications, they have an external memory slot that admits up to 1000 GB and equal 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much greater performance than Galaxy A16 (Rumored), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 8 GB more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a lot better camera than Galaxy A16 (Rumored), and although they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a camera in the back with much more mega-pixels.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a battery life that is very similar to the battery duration in Galaxy A16 (Rumored).
Although Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy A16 (Rumored), and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy A16 (Rumored). If you want to save some money, you can buy Galaxy A16 (Rumored), letting go a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.