Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12 |
| -- | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a score of 95.4, which is way better than Galaxy A16 (Rumored)'s overall score of 72.7. Despite being the best in this comparison review, the Galaxy S22 Ultra is a somewhat thicker and heavier cellphone than the Galaxy A16 (Rumored). Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has the previous 13 version and Galaxy A16 (Rumored) has Android 14.
Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a better looking screen than Galaxy A16 (Rumored), because it has a greater pixels density, a higher 1440 x 3088px resolution, a bit bigger screen and a really brighter screen. Galaxy S22 Ultra has an extremely better processing unit than Galaxy A16 (Rumored), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has more RAM.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra shoots much better photographs and videos than Galaxy A16 (Rumored), and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a lot higher 108 megapixels resolution camera in the back. Galaxy A16 (Rumored) features a lot bigger memory for applications and games than Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A16 (Rumored) also has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra and Galaxy A16 (Rumored) have similar battery performance.
Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy A16 (Rumored), and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy A16 (Rumored). So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Galaxy S22 Ultra, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Galaxy A16 (Rumored), giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.