Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored), getting an 83.3 score against 72.7. The Galaxy S9 body is a bit thicker but somewhat lighter than Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored). Galaxy S9 has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A16 (Rumored), because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2960px resolution and a better pixel density.
The Galaxy A16 (Rumored) counts with a much greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy S9 has a much more powerful processor than Galaxy A16 (Rumored). Both have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM memory.
The Galaxy S9 counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy A16 (Rumored), because although it has a way worse resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger aperture. The Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored) has a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Samsung Galaxy S9 is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.