Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| -- | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| $ 200.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 385 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has an overall score of 80.1, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored)'s 72.7 score. Although it's the best we compare here, Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a notably thicker and incredibly heavier phone than Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored). Both devices in our current comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version while Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored) has Android 14 version.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored), because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution. Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a much better processing power than Galaxy A16 (Rumored). Both of them have the same RAM amount and 8 CPU cores.
The Galaxy A16 (Rumored) shoots better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a way better 50 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera. The Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored) has a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored) has a little longer battery performance than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy A16 (Rumored), and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy A16 (Rumored). So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Galaxy A16 (Rumored), giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.