Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro is better than the Galaxy A16 (Rumored), with a score of 81 against 72.7. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but the Galaxy XCover Pro has an older 11 version and Galaxy A16 (Rumored) has Android 14. The Galaxy XCover Pro is a thicker and just a little bit heavier device than the Galaxy A16 (Rumored).
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a way better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored). Both of them have 8 processing cores and the same RAM amount. The Galaxy A16 (Rumored) counts with a slightly better looking display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a quite lower pixels amount per screen inch, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Galaxy A16 (Rumored) also counts with a little bigger display.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a slightly better camera than Galaxy A16 (Rumored), because although it has a camera with a lot lower resolution, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photography and videos. Galaxy A16 (Rumored) features a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored) counts with better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4050mAh.
Although Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Galaxy A16 (Rumored), and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy A16 (Rumored). So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Galaxy XCover Pro, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Galaxy A16 (Rumored), resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.