Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2018-07-30 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 3.15 x 0.47 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 760 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3540mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZ2 Premium is better than Galaxy A16 (Rumored), getting a general score of 82.2 against 72.7. Xperia XZ2 Premium's body is extremely thicker and heavier than Galaxy A16 (Rumored). Xperia XZ2 Premium has a way better screen than Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored), because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher number of pixels per inch of display, a much higher resolution of 2160 x 3840px and a little bit more brightness.
The Galaxy A16 (Rumored) has a lot bigger storage to install games and applications than Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has more internal storage capacity and a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The Xperia XZ2 Premium counts with a much faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored), and although they both have 8 cores, the Xperia XZ2 Premium also has more RAM memory.
The Xperia XZ2 Premium shoots better photographs and videos than Galaxy A16 (Rumored), although it has a back camera with a way lower 19 MP resolution, they both have the same camera aperture. Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored) features a superior battery lifetime than Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3540mAh.
Although Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Galaxy A16 (Rumored), and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy A16 (Rumored). If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the Galaxy A16 (Rumored), letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.