Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2017-04-05 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | Black, Blue and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Sony Xperia XZs is just a bit better than Galaxy A16 (Rumored), getting a 77.2 score against 72.7. Sony Xperia XZs is a a little thicker but lighter phone than the Galaxy A16 (Rumored). The Xperia XZs counts with a way better performance than Galaxy A16 (Rumored), although it has a lower number of cores (but faster), they both have the same RAM amount.
Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored) has a slightly better display than Xperia XZs, because although it has a bit lower display density, it also counts with a larger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px. Xperia XZs captures much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored), although it has a smaller aperture and a much less MP resolution back facing camera.
Galaxy A16 (Rumored) counts with a much bigger storage for applications and games than Xperia XZs, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored) has a much better battery performance than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2900mAh.
Although Xperia XZs is a better device, it is way more expensive than Galaxy A16 (Rumored), and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy A16 (Rumored). So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Xperia XZs, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Galaxy A16 (Rumored), giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.