Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-08-20 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has an overall score of 82.7, which is better than Galaxy A16 (Rumored)'s general score of 72.7. Both phones we are comparing here have Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has an older 10 version while Galaxy A16 (Rumored) has Android 14. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is a just a little lighter but somewhat thicker cellphone than the Galaxy A16 (Rumored).
The Galaxy A16 (Rumored) counts with a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has a little inferior pixel amount in each inch of screen, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, the Galaxy A16 (Rumored) also counts with a quite larger display and a really brighter display.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a much powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored), and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has 2 GB more RAM. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a much better camera than Galaxy A16 (Rumored), although it has a camera with a worse resolution, they both have the same diafragm aperture.
Galaxy A16 (Rumored) has a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A16 (Rumored) also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy A16 (Rumored) counts with better battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.