Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-02-11 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | Atlantis blue, Matrix purple and Phoenix red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco X2 has an overall score of 79.3, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A16 (Rumored)'s score of 72.7. Despite being the best device we are comparing, Xiaomi Poco X2's design is just a bit heavier and thicker than the Galaxy A16 (Rumored). Both devices we compare here have Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Poco X2 has 11 version while Galaxy A16 (Rumored) has Android 14 version.
The Xiaomi Poco X2 has a very superior processing unit than Galaxy A16 (Rumored), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Poco X2 also has 2 GB more RAM. The Galaxy A16 (Rumored) features just a bit better display than Xiaomi Poco X2, although it has a bit worse screen pixel density and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340, they both have a screen with the same size.
The Xiaomi Poco X2 shoots way better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored), because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a much more MP back facing camera. Galaxy A16 (Rumored) counts with much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco X2, because it has a SD memory slot that admits up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory.
The Galaxy A16 (Rumored) counts with just a bit longer battery duration than Xiaomi Poco X2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.