Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2019-04-10 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 11 Pro Max is better than Galaxy A20, getting a global score of 85.3 against 74.7. The iPhone 11 Pro Max comes with iOS 15.x OS, and Galaxy A20 has Android 11 OS. Despite being the best cellphone in our current comparison, it must be noted that it is also heavier and a bit thicker. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max features a better performance than Galaxy A20, because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processor and a greater amount of RAM.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max features a lot better display than Galaxy A20, because it has a little bit bigger display, a much higher 1242 x 2688 resolution and way more pixels per inch of display. Galaxy A20 features a superior memory for applications and games than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The iPhone 11 Pro Max captures better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A20, because although it has a lesser megapixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video definition, a bigger camera aperture and a larger camera sensor. The iPhone 11 Pro Max and Galaxy A20 feature really similar batteries performance, although the iPhone 11 Pro Max has just 3969mAh battery capacity.
Although iPhone 11 Pro Max is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy A20, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy A20. So if you need that extra features, you can buy iPhone 11 Pro Max, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Samsung Galaxy A20, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.