Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2019-04-10 | 2020-10-23 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.66 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 12 Pro has a general score of 92.8, which is way better than Galaxy A20's overall score of 74.7. Although the iPhone 12 Pro is heavier than the Galaxy A20, it's just a little thinner and newer. IPhone 12 Pro has iOS 15.x operating system, while Galaxy A20 comes with Android 11 operating system.
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro counts with a faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A20, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster), it also counts with a larger amount of RAM and a 64-bits processor. IPhone 12 Pro counts with a much better display than Galaxy A20, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way better 1170 x 2532 resolution and a lot greater pixel count per screen inch.
IPhone 12 Pro counts with a bit more storage for applications and games than Galaxy A20, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal storage. IPhone 12 Pro takes better photographs and videos than Galaxy A20, because although it has a lower resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better low light photos and video and a much better (4K) video quality.
Samsung Galaxy A20 counts with a much better battery life than iPhone 12 Pro, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Although iPhone 12 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Galaxy A20, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy A20. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the iPhone 12 Pro, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Galaxy A20, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.