Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | iOS 15.x |
| 2019-04-10 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 13 Pro is much better than the Galaxy A20, getting a general score of 93.3 against 74.7. The iPhone 13 Pro construction is a lot newer and a little thinner than the Galaxy A20's, but it is also somewhat heavier. IPhone 13 Pro counts with iOS 15.x operating system, and Galaxy A20 works with Android 11 operating system.
The iPhone 13 Pro has a much more vibrant screen than Samsung Galaxy A20, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a way better pixels density and a way higher 1170 x 2532 resolution. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro has slightly more storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A20, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro has a much faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A20, because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processor and more RAM memory. Galaxy A20 counts with improved battery performance than iPhone 13 Pro, because it has a 29 percent more battery size. The iPhone 13 Pro captures much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A20, because although it has a back camera with a worse 12 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a much larger aperture to capture better photography and video in poorly lited environments and a way higher (4K) video definition.
Although iPhone 13 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Galaxy A20, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy A20. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy the Galaxy A20, and give up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.