Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | iOS 15.x |
| 2019-04-10 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A20, getting a 93.2 score against 74.7. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with iOS 15.x OS, while Samsung Galaxy A20 has Android 11 OS. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max's design is incredibly newer and just a little bit thinner, but way heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A20.
The iPhone 13 Pro Max features a lot better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A20, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with 3 GB more RAM and a 64-bit CPU. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a way better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A20, because it has a way better display pixel density, a much higher 1284 x 2778px resolution and a little bit larger screen.
The iPhone 13 Pro Max features a slightly bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A20, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The iPhone 13 Pro Max has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A20, because although it has a less mega pixels back camera, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a much larger aperture for better low light captures and videos.
IPhone 13 Pro Max counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A20, because it has a 9% more battery size.
Although iPhone 13 Pro Max is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy A20, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy A20. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy iPhone 13 Pro Max, else you can save some money and buy the Galaxy A20, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.