Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-10 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X is much better than Galaxy A20, getting an 88.1 score against 74.7. Apple iPhone X is an older and a little heavier cellphone than the Galaxy A20, but Apple managed to build it just a little thinner anyway. The Apple iPhone X has a more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A20, because although it has less cores , and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Apple iPhone X also counts with a 64-bit processor.
IPhone X counts with a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy A20, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a way better resolution of 1125 x 2436px and a lot higher number of pixels per display inch. The Apple iPhone X has a much better memory for apps and games than Galaxy A20, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory capacity.
The iPhone X captures much better photos and videos than Galaxy A20, because although it has a back facing camera with a worse resolution, it also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a much higher 3840x2160 video quality and a larger aperture to capture better low-light photography and videos.
The Samsung Galaxy A20 features a much better battery performance than Apple iPhone X, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Galaxy A20, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy A20. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get Galaxy A20, letting go a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.