Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-10 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XR is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A20, with an 82 score against 74.7. The iPhone XR is a better phone than Samsung Galaxy A20, we must highlight that it is also somewhat heavier and a bit thicker. The iPhone XR has a better performing CPU than Galaxy A20, because although it has an inferior number of cores , and they both have 3 GB of RAM memory, the iPhone XR also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
IPhone XR counts with a better screen than Samsung Galaxy A20, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little better pixels density and a bit higher 828 x 1792 resolution. IPhone XR shoots much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy A20, because although it has a lesser megapixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better low-light images, a much better 3840x2160 video definition and a bigger back camera sensor which gives a higher image and video quality.
Galaxy A20 features a much greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone XR, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A20 has improved battery performance than iPhone XR, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone XR is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Samsung Galaxy A20, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Samsung Galaxy A20. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Apple iPhone XR, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Samsung Galaxy A20, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.