Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 5.1, 5.0 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2014-10-15 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Blue and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 1019.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 490 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3220mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Nexus 6 is slightly better than Galaxy A20, having an 81.1 score against 74.7. Both phones we compare here include Android OS, but the Google Nexus 6 has the older 5.1 version and Galaxy A20 has Android 11 version. Google Nexus 6 is a older, extremely thicker and a little heavier device than Galaxy A20.
The Google Nexus 6 has a lot better screen than Samsung Galaxy A20, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a much higher screen pixel density and a lot better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution. The Google Nexus 6 has a bit faster processor than Galaxy A20, because although it has less processing cores , and they both have 3 GB of RAM memory, the Google Nexus 6 also counts with an extra graphics processor.
The Google Nexus 6 shoots slightly better pictures and videos than Galaxy A20, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have a 13 megapixels resolution camera in the back, the Google Nexus 6 also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality. The Samsung Galaxy A20 has a much bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Google Nexus 6, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 512 GB.
Galaxy A20 features better battery lifetime than Google Nexus 6, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3220mAh.
Although Google Nexus 6 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Samsung Galaxy A20, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Samsung Galaxy A20. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Google Nexus 6, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Samsung Galaxy A20, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.