Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-10 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Black, Gray and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel is slightly better than Galaxy A20, with an 80.2 score against 74.7. Despite of the fact the Google Pixel is extremely older and a bit thicker than Galaxy A20, it's body is still somewhat lighter. The Google Pixel's processing unit is very similar to the Galaxy A20 one, because although the Google Pixel has 4 lesser CPU cores , it also counts with more RAM.
The Google Pixel counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy A20, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution and a lot better display density. The Google Pixel takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A20, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture and a back camera with less MP resolution, it also counts with a much larger camera sensor which provides a much better image and video quality and a way better 3840x2160 video quality.
Google Pixel features slightly more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A20, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage. The Galaxy A20 has a superior battery duration than Google Pixel, because it has a 44 percent more battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy A20, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy A20. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Google Pixel, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Galaxy A20, resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.