Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-10 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Black and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL has an overall score of 82.5, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy A20's 74.7 general score. The Google Pixel 2 XL construction has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy A20, but it's just a little heavier. The Google Pixel 2 XL has a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A20, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 2 XL also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 2 XL features a much sharper screen than Galaxy A20, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a much greater pixels number per screen inch. Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a slightly better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A20, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
Google Pixel 2 XL takes a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A20, because although it has a camera with a worse 12.2 MP resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better photography and videos in poorly lited situations, a larger sensor providing a better image quality and a much higher (4K) video resolution.
Galaxy A20 has a bit better battery duration than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 14 percent greater battery size.
Google Pixel 2 XL not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.