Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-10 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A20, getting a global score of 80 against 74.7. Google Pixel 3's construction has the same thickness than the Samsung Galaxy A20, but it is lighter. Google Pixel 3 has a better screen than Galaxy A20, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher 1080 x 2160 resolution and a lot better number of pixels per inch of display.
The Samsung Galaxy A20 features a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 512 GB. Google Pixel 3 has a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A20, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 3 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Google Pixel 3 counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A20, because although it has a camera with a lower resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture for better low light photos and video, a larger sensor and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution. Samsung Galaxy A20 counts with a very superior battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 2915mAh.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Google Pixel 3 is also cheaper than the other phone, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.