Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-10 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A20, with an 81.9 score against 74.7. The Google Pixel 4 construction is just a bit lighter but just a little thicker than Samsung Galaxy A20, and both were released with only 7 months difference. The Google Pixel 4 features a better screen than Galaxy A20, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2280 and a much better pixels density.
Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A20, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 4 also has more RAM memory. Galaxy A20 counts with a much greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Google Pixel 4 shoots a little bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A20, because although it has a back camera with lesser mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light captures and videos, a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a bigger back camera sensor.
The Galaxy A20 counts with a much better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Although Google Pixel 4 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy A20, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy A20. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Google Pixel 4, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Galaxy A20, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.