Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-10 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL has an overall score of 82.9, which is better than the Galaxy A20's score of 74.7. Google Pixel 4 XL's construction is somewhat heavier and just a little thicker than Galaxy A20. The Google Pixel 4 XL features just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A20, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has more RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 4 XL features a much better looking display than Galaxy A20, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a much better resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels and a lot more pixels per inch in the display. Google Pixel 4 XL has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy A20, because although it has a less mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture, a bigger sensor providing a better image quality and a lot higher (4K) video resolution.
The Galaxy A20 has a much bigger storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Galaxy A20 features a bit better battery life than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has an 8 percent larger battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Samsung Galaxy A20, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy A20. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Google Pixel 4 XL, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Samsung Galaxy A20, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.