Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Just black |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a has a score of 82.9, which is better than Galaxy A20's 74.7 overall score. Both of these phones use the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't notice any difference in that aspect. Google Pixel 4a's construction is newer and somewhat lighter than Galaxy A20's, but it's a bit thicker.
The Google Pixel 4a counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy A20, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a way better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a lot higher display pixel density. The Google Pixel 4a features a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A20, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Google Pixel 4a also has more RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 4a has a slightly bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A20, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Google Pixel 4a captures a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A20, because although it has a back-facing camera with a lower 12.2 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better low light photos and video, a lot better 3840x2160 video quality and a larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a better photo and video quality.
Galaxy A20 features better battery life than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel 4a is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Samsung Galaxy A20, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Samsung Galaxy A20. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get Samsung Galaxy A20, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.