Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Clearly white and Just black |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a score of 87.5, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy A20's 74.7 score. Google Pixel 4a 5G is a newer and a bit lighter phone than the Samsung Galaxy A20, although it's also a little thicker. Both of these phones have the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so they should count with all the same OS features.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a little better performance than Galaxy A20, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has more RAM. The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a much better display than Galaxy A20, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a way better display density.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a slightly bigger storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A20, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy A20 has a bit better battery duration than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 3% more battery capacity.
Google Pixel 4a 5G takes much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy A20, because although it has a camera in the back with less MP resolution, it also counts with a bigger back camera sensor capturing better quality photographs, a way better (4K) video quality and a bigger camera aperture.
Although Google Pixel 4a 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Samsung Galaxy A20, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Samsung Galaxy A20. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy A20, and give up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.