Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-10 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 is much better than Galaxy A20, getting an 89 score against 74.7. Google Pixel 5 is a somewhat lighter cellphone than the Galaxy A20, but both are 0.31inches thick. Google Pixel 5 counts with a bit better performance than Galaxy A20, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has more RAM.
The Google Pixel 5 counts with a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A20, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a lot better screen pixel density and a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px. The Google Pixel 5 counts with a superior camera than Galaxy A20, because although it has a camera with less mega pixels, it also counts with a larger camera aperture, a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Google Pixel 5 features a slightly bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A20, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity. The Google Pixel 5 has just a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A20, because it has a 2% more battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel 5 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy A20, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy A20. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get the Galaxy A20, giving up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.