Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 5.0 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Plastic | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 268 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The HTC One M9 is slightly better than the Galaxy A20, with a 77.7 score against 74.7. HTC One M9's body is just a bit lighter than Galaxy A20, although it is thicker and was released many years before. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but HTC One M9 has the previous 5.0 version while Galaxy A20 has Android 11 version.
The HTC One M9 features a better processing unit than Galaxy A20, and although they both have the same number of cores and 3 GB of RAM memory, the HTC One M9 also has a 64-bits CPU and an extra GPU. HTC One M9 features a lot better screen than Galaxy A20, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a much greater screen density and a higher 1920 x 1080 resolution.
The Galaxy A20 has a very superior storage for applications and games than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 32 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A20 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A20 has a much longer battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has a 41 percent larger battery size.
The HTC One M9 has a much better camera than Galaxy A20, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels, a lot bigger back camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photographs and a much better (4K) video resolution.
HTC One M9 is a bit more expensive than Galaxy A20, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.