Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-04-10 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G7 Fit is a little bit better than Galaxy A20, having a 77 score against 74.7. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the LG G7 Fit has 8.1 Oreo version while Galaxy A20 has Android 11. The LG G7 Fit is a just a little lighter cellphone than Galaxy A20, but they have the same thickness.
Samsung Galaxy A20 and LG G7 Fit feature extremely similar processors, because although the LG G7 Fit has an inferior number of cores (although faster), it also counts with a greater amount of RAM. The LG G7 Fit counts with a much sharper display than Galaxy A20, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3120.
LG G7 Fit shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A20, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low-light photos and video, and they both have a 0.32 inches back camera sensor, the LG G7 Fit also counts with a lot better (4K) video definition and a back-facing camera with more MP.
The LG G7 Fit has much more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A20, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the LG G7 Fit also has an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy A20 has longer battery duration than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.