Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-04-10 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Aurora black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G8X ThinQ is much better than Samsung Galaxy A20, having a general score of 82.7 against 74.7. Even being the best cellphone in our current comparison, LG G8X ThinQ's body is a bit thicker and heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A20. Both of these devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but LG G8X ThinQ has the older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy A20 has Android 11.
LG G8X ThinQ counts with a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A20, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory. LG G8X ThinQ has a sharper screen than Galaxy A20, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a much higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and much more pixels per display inch.
The LG G8X ThinQ has a very superior memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A20, because it has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal storage capacity. The LG G8X ThinQ shoots much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy A20, because although it has a lower 12 MP resolution camera, it also counts with a way higher (4K) video resolution, a larger diafragm aperture and a larger back camera sensor taking higher quality photographs.
The Galaxy A20 and the LG G8X ThinQ count with similar battery performance.
LG G8X ThinQ costs more money than Galaxy A20, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.