Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Plastic | Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V10 is just a bit better than the Galaxy A20, having a 78.6 score against 74.7. Although LG V10 is better than the Galaxy A20, we must highlight that it is also a notably older, just a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier device. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but LG V10 has an older 5.1 version and Galaxy A20 has Android 11.
LG V10 counts with a much better display than Galaxy A20, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot better number of pixels per inch in the screen and a lot higher 2560 x 1440 resolution. LG V10 counts with a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A20, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal memory.
Galaxy A20 features a bit faster processor than LG V10, because although it has less RAM, it also counts with a larger number of cores. LG V10 captures much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy A20, because it has a lot better (4K) video definition, a larger back-facing camera sensor, a bigger camera aperture and a back facing camera with a higher resolution.
Galaxy A20 features superior battery duration than LG V10, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although LG V10 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy A20, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Samsung Galaxy A20. If you want to save some money, you can get Samsung Galaxy A20, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.