Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-04-10 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ has a general score of 82.5, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A20's 74.7 general score. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS, but the LG V30S ThinQ has newer 8.0 Oreo version while Samsung Galaxy A20 has Android 11 version. LG V30S ThinQ is an older cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy A20, but it's just a little bit thinner and a little bit lighter anyway.
LG V30S ThinQ has a way better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A20, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a much greater amount of pixels per inch of screen and a much better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels. The LG V30S ThinQ features a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A20, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has 3 GB more RAM.
LG V30S ThinQ features a lot bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A20, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A20 features better battery duration than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 21 percent greater battery capacity.
The LG V30S ThinQ shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A20, because it has a back facing camera with more megapixels, a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a larger camera aperture for better low-light photos and a larger sensor providing a higher image quality.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it is way more expensive than Galaxy A20, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy A20. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy LG V30S ThinQ, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Galaxy A20, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.