Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ is slightly better than the Galaxy A20, with an 81.2 score against 74.7. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but LG V40 ThinQ has the previous 10 version while Galaxy A20 has Android 11 version. The LG V40 ThinQ construction weights the same than Galaxy A20, but it is just a little bit thinner.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy A20, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM. LG V40 ThinQ has a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy A20, and although they both have a display of the same size, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a much higher 1440 x 3120 resolution and a much greater pixels density.
LG V40 ThinQ features a much bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A20, because it has 32 GB more internal memory capacity and an external memory card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. LG V40 ThinQ takes much better videos and photos than Galaxy A20, because although it has a lesser mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a way better (4K) video resolution, a way larger diafragm aperture and a larger sensor which gives a higher photo and video quality.
Samsung Galaxy A20 features improved battery performance than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 21 percent greater battery capacity.
The LG V40 ThinQ costs more than the Samsung Galaxy A20, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.