Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-10 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has a general score of 87.1, which is better than Galaxy A20's 74.7 score. The LG Velvet body has the same thickness than Galaxy A20, but it's a little bit heavier. LG Velvet has a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A20, because it has a quite bigger screen, a much better resolution of 1080 x 2460px and a greater pixel density.
LG Velvet has a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A20, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG Velvet also has a greater amount of RAM memory. LG Velvet has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A20, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage.
The LG Velvet takes much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A20, because it has a lot higher video resolution, a larger camera aperture, a lot larger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a back camera with a way better resolution. The LG Velvet features just a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy A20, because it has an 8% bigger battery size.
LG Velvet costs a lot more money than Galaxy A20, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.