Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola edge is better than the Galaxy A20, getting an 89.6 score against 74.7. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but Motorola edge has older 10 version while Galaxy A20 has Android 11 version. Motorola edge's body is newer, but somewhat thicker and heavier than Galaxy A20.
Motorola edge features a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A20, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Motorola edge also has a higher amount of RAM. Motorola edge features a more vivid display than Galaxy A20, because it has a lot higher 1080 x 2340 resolution, a greater pixels number in each inch of screen and a quite larger display.
Motorola edge has a much greater storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A20, because it has 224 GB more internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Motorola edge captures a lot better photos and videos than Galaxy A20, because it has a larger aperture to take better low-light photography and video, a much more megapixels back camera, a way larger sensor shooting way better quality photos and videos and a much better (4K) video quality.
The Motorola edge has just a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy A20, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Although Motorola edge is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy A20, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy A20. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Motorola edge, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Galaxy A20, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.