Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro has an overall score of 92.8, which is way better than Galaxy A20's overall score of 74.7. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 20 Pro has newer 12 version and Galaxy A20 has Android 11 version, so it provides some nice extra features and performance improvements. Motorola Edge 20 Pro's design has the same thickness than Galaxy A20, but it is somewhat heavier.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A20, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has more RAM. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A20, because it has a lot better 1080 x 2400 resolution, a quite larger display and a greater number of pixels per inch of screen.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A20, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Motorola Edge 20 Pro shoots much better photos and videos than Galaxy A20, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has a lot more MP camera in the back and a way better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A20, because it has a 13% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.