Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2022-08-18 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Mineral Gray |
| Plastic | -- |
| $ 166.00 | $ 498.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge (2022) is much better than the Galaxy A20, with a overall score of 84.7 against 74.7. These phones include Android operating system, but Motorola Edge (2022) has a more recent 12 version and Galaxy A20 has Android 11 version, giving you some nice extra features. Although the Motorola Edge (2022) is incredibly newer than the Galaxy A20, it is a little thicker and a little heavier.
Motorola Edge (2022) features a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A20, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Motorola Edge (2022) also has more RAM. The Motorola Edge (2022) counts with a sharper display than Galaxy A20, because it has a greater pixel number per inch in the screen, a little larger screen and a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2400.
Motorola Edge (2022) features just a bit more memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A20, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The Motorola Edge (2022) takes way better videos and photos than Galaxy A20, because it has a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a lot higher resolution camera and a larger camera aperture.
The Motorola Edge (2022) features greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A20, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Although Motorola Edge (2022) is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Samsung Galaxy A20, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Samsung Galaxy A20. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get Samsung Galaxy A20, letting go some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.