Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a score of 78.5, which is just a bit better than Galaxy A20's global score of 74.7. Both phones we are comparing here come with Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has 12 version while Galaxy A20 has Android 11. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion is a much newer phone, and it's also a little bit thinner and a little bit lighter than the Galaxy A20.
Samsung Galaxy A20 has a much better processing power than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has 5 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a lot better display than Samsung Galaxy A20, because it has a much better screen pixel density, a much better 1080 x 2400px resolution and a little larger display.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a much better camera than Galaxy A20, because it has a way higher video resolution, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking lot better quality videos and photographs, a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a larger camera aperture. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a slightly bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A20, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a bit superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A20, because it has a 10 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.